Showing posts with label exposure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label exposure. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 11, 2017

morality from mortality

Inspiration comes when you are lest expecting it. There are so many exposures you come across in life. I use the word exposures, as learning comes from exposures. Exposures can be in the form of an article, a book, a statement, an experience, a talk, an observation anything. Exposures can change us in ways that we don’t think was possible. Exposures help us understand life and gain from perspectives. The internet for sure has helped us expose ourselves much more. But in many way’s it’s like a TV. You can choose what you want to be exposed to. Simply having the internet on does not in any ways mean that you are going to get smarter. Infact if I see the internet these days and see my Facebook feed then it’s pretty much a shit fest where you simply are trying to get to an opinion that you already have and then trying your best to get data that proves it, in whichever way. I think seeing the FB feed these days is the worst thing ever. It’s like the days when TV burst open in India. From two state run channels we moved to a 24X7 format and the world was being beamed into our homes every day. All the channels came in and we saw discovery and national geographic channels coming in and like all good meaning people, we thought that these are the channels that we will end up watching and educating ourselves. And like all god-fearing people (forgive the ridiculous use of an irrelevant adjective) we would watch everything else but these channels. After all how many times can you watch the leopard devour the cow. It gets monotonous after some time. I think I spent a large part of my college time watching TV. Then came a time when TV became crazy and there was nothing to watch. I remember in those days going through all the channels one by one and circling it again and again, bored and hoping for something interesting to watch. There wasn’t anything.
TV definitely did not make me too much smarter.

Internet and now mobile internet is the same. It’s not going to make you too much smarter by itself. You have to learn what to search for, what to read through and what to take and what not to take in. That’s why I talk about exposures. You have to structure your life around exposures and learnings if you want to bring greater intelligence in your life. Though of course not bring in intelligence can also result in happiness. The two are definitely not co related. In fact, sometimes I think a strong argument can be made in favor of the two being inversely proportionate till a point after which it could again flip and then flip again. But still, for me learning is as important as eating and the internet as a device has contributed immensely to my learning. I envy Jispa and her ilk for they have internet before they were born. The internet has been a useful ally in her studies and in her life. Thanks to this the world has come closer to her than ever before and so has the vast depository of knowledge as it makes itself accessible to the child while growing up. She needs so little of me for teaching her stuff; she gets what she needs from the internet.

A few weeks back, I was addressing a class of teachers, who had to come for a refresher course. The college tried to organize the course by having industry faculty as well. My topic was the advent of digital in our lives. I had to teach this to the teachers and explain to them on the possibilities that this has for all of us. At the end, one question was how could teachers bring digital into the class rooms. I gave my daughters example of how digital has already entered the class room. Long back I had learnt of a technique which I have often applied. You first give the topic in advance and the reading material. People read on their own and understand and come to class. At the start of the class you take a 5 minute test and then start the class. This way there is no real teaching left to do but you can spend that time on discussions. Discussions that take the topic forward. So I was telling the teachers that they need to simply send the links to the kids beforehand on reading / watching material and then from there on you start with an online test which the kids can take on their phones itself and then you can start the discussion in class, now that the kids are well prepared. While I was explaining this to them I realized that I have to start doing this myself and this time in class I explained that from next time they will get reading material and a test to do in class. Cool nah! In return they can come to class 15 min late without any repercussions and they can have their cell phones on while attending the class. No questions asked. Let’s try this experiment. Have an open classroom with lots of interaction and complete freedom. So now to try all these things from the next class onwards. This puts some pressure on me to do the preparations, but I think it will be worth all the effort. At least we will know what price freedom extracts from us.

Coming back to the topic of exposures. I have learnt that the best learning comes from a variety of exposures. It is very difficult, almost impossible to predict which exposures lead to the most amount of learning. Small small things in your life that happen to you or those around you, help you unravel your life and give you lessons you are not likely to forget. Once my boss came to me and said that he had the most amazing experience with the COO of the firm. He had gone to him with a complaint and the COO called on the employee, ascertained the truth and then castigated him in front of my boss, reprimanding him for the lacuna in service. My boss was impressed that justice was swiftly delivered. I have kept that in mind whenever someone comes to me with an issue as regards my team. If my team member is not delivering the service that he should, he is pulled up and immediately told that he needs to shape up and that I wouldn’t tolerate any shortcomings.

Another one that recently changed an important part of me, was an app called Blinkist. It basically gives a summary of book every day that one can read through. I think it doesn’t do a great job, but is an interesting app for those wishing to read fast enough. I got it from a friend’s recommendation and then promptly recommended to a friend. The friend then took the paid version that allows more than one “book of the day’ read. She then sent me an interesting book summary, which at the right time and the right context completely tipped me over to one side. It was on Mortality by Hitchens. While most the summary was ok, one aspect of it just blew me away. He was a committed atheist and after being diagnosed with a terminal illness he refused to let that affect his belief, or rather disbelief in God and religion. That made me think about my own belief. I wasn’t religious as I have already written about in previous blogs and I wasn’t an atheist. I was ambivalent. I was middling. I did not know how to describe my views and I tried creative solutions like – pantheist. After reading this passage (as below) for some reason I cleared my mind. I decided for myself that I was an atheist, through and through. I did not believe in God. There is no such thing such as God and definitely organized religion is a complete farce. I do not believe in it one bit. So yes, now, I call myself very clearly an atheist. If I believe in logic and reason, I cannot believe in the notion of religion and it various offshoots and practices.

Extract of the summary -
After Hitchens’s diagnosis, he explored his convictions about atheism in the face of death.
Hitchens valued his commitment to the concept of atheism. And despite outside pressure, he stuck by his beliefs through his illness until the very end.
Many friends and companions pressured Hitchens to find faith as he neared death. Although he appreciated his friends praying for him, he didn’t believe it would make a difference to his situation.
Even strangers would try to convert him. People callously made bets online about how long it would take him to accept God.
Hitchens also received much criticism from people who told him he’d “burn in hell” if he failed to convert before he passed away. Some even had the audacity to tell him this while he was on his deathbed.
Despite the pressure, Hitchens believed that changing his mind about religion would be dishonest, and certainly wouldn’t help in the face of divine judgment. Becoming a Christian at the last moment wouldn’t exactly absolve him from being an atheist most of his life. Surely he couldn’t prove his faith was true if he only accepted God just before death?
Hitchens never understood why organized religion is so exclusive when it comes to the afterlife. What if he converted to Christianity, for example, only to discover that Judaism or Islam was the true religion?
The prospect of death made Hitchens realize how important it is for people to stand by their convictions. Ultimately, nobody knows if there is life after death. Nobody knows what happens to the “soul” when a body dies.
Hitchens would have been lying to himself, his loved ones and his fans if he were to back down, just because he was afraid of death.
“If I convert, it’s because it’s better that a believer dies than an atheist does.”

---

That helped me in another way as well. Linda Goodman. The famous astrologer who has written and sold millions of her book called Sun Signs. Here she writes about various people born under their sun signs and she describes them in great detail. To me, I have always found it difficult to refute her truth about the sun sugns. They seem so right and they seem just appropriate about people according to their Sun Signs. Possibly there is something to it. Surely sun signs cannot predict my day to day actions (that’s too primitive) but surely  they predict the core behavior of men. Recently someone asked me about it. I took inspiration from my new found belief in atheism and said that if fundamentally, I do not believe that stars can cause any change in me, then fundamentally I do not believe in the book. Yes, I do admit that when I read the book, I too feel that it does accurately describe the people, but then I must reject the cause and the effect, as I do not believe in it. So hence in spite of it being seemingly true, it is false. I gave the analogy a magician, who suddenly might magically make a bird appear or disappear. I know that it is false despite my seeing it as true. It is a clever ruse. I must dismiss it no matter how real it gets. Similarly, no matter how real the description, it is false. If I don’t believe in the roots of it, then it is false, in spite of what I think. Hence Linda Goodman is a false story line. Possibly the way it is described every man or woman would read it and see themselves in the description, possibly being fooled in it. Possibly a taurean description could also be equally appealing to a Leo had he been explained as such. Possibly the truth is what you make of it, and now Leos are possibly supposed to behave in a certain manner as people expect them to behave thus! I am ready to take in any other wild hypothesis but I will not believe that a star on top has the ability to change my behavior or influence it. You either believe in it or you don’t. You are either an atheist or you r a believer. Simple.

This little exposure of an app and a link that a friend sent is just one of the small examples of me not knowing which exposure will get me where. This was a valuable addition to my moralities and my beliefs. I wouldn’t have ever thought that it could have helped me in so many ways.

Jasmine and me have been quite practical in our thinking. We just bought a new car and when we went to collect it, we did away with the traditional coconut and garland ceremony that the dealer had organized for us. We even implored them not to burst the confittee and spread more litter on the road. At the end the sales girl practically pleased with us to at least click a picture of us getting a delivery of the car. “sir atleast this much”. As soon we got the delivery, I got rid of the ribbons all over and got the entire emotion thing over and done with. It’s a logical extremity.

Exposure define us and influence us. We don’t know what’s going to hit us. Hence we must try and get the maximum possible. Look for new and varied exposures at all times. It could be in the form of books, travel, hotels, people, anything. Keep looking, keep exposing yourself and keep an eye out for any new thing coming your way. You never know wat you will learn from it. Even an old thing for that matter. There is a time for everything. The same exposure at a different time will possibly give you much more meaning than what you have anticipated.

Bonus Video on Hitchens. Very interesting


Friday, November 13, 2015

random rants of a father of a lovely lady!

there

The answer to the question that if i am going at the speed of light what happens when I look back?

Obviously it wasn't as simplistic as I made it out to be. Which just proves how dangerous is it to have half knowledge. I keep saying this and people don't believe it that all the knowledge that i have is very dangerous. after reading so much over these years, i have amassed a lot of knowledge but nothing super deep in one field. It gives me amazing breadth, the ability to pull off examples that are from seemingly unrelated fields nut what it definitely does is makes me very very vulnerable in a field of experts. Most others wouldn't even venture there, but with my limited knowledge, I would venture into the territory and get caught out.

Its a good thing I am in marketing. I need to get as much exposure as possible. I have over the years been able to play to my strengths, which is take inspiration from various unrelated fields and apply to business issues and try and take a creative leap. This has so far bode well for me. As I get older I use these experiences to make a point or talk deeper through the matter. But then the age old problem catches up. I hate it when it happens - the problem when one articulate meets an inarticulate. or an open articulate meets a closed inarticulate. Basically i will be using all sorts of references and data points to prove my point and then the opposite guy will just stop the conversation. They will refuse to discuss the issue. They say they cant argue with me or they don't want to argue with me or something to that effect. That is a complete piss off as far as i am concerned. Why would you not want to discuss your issues openly, just because you can articulate it well enough? Especially if you are closed to the thought. If you are simply inarticulate but open you will quickly realise that I try my best to articulate your side as well. That unnerves some more of them. Why would I be doing that? Do I really want to help them or am I just taking their case. The smarter ones understand and the secure ones love it, but a large majority - i think i just let go.

The art of keeping quiet and let them rant is something I have developed over a period of time. Just let go when things are not going great - conversation wise. Keep quiet - think deep - relax. your own thoughts are fun things to be.

Speaking of which Jispa has had her share of own thoughts which are running at some obscene rate of acceleration and change. She is a teen and her synapses are getting formed every day. She changing and along with herself - we all are trying to keep pace. She had always hated haircuts. She wants them long but she doesn't know how to handle them. In the past I think she has liked only one haircut. Haircuts is something Jasmine and me have decided is a battle not worth fighting. You decide what you want and when you want - we refuse to get involved or tell her what haircut or tell the hair dresser. Stay away from this ticking tim bomb as much as possible. So suddenly when jasmine told me that she needs to go for a haircut with Jispa i looked at Jasmine with a quizzical look. “dont tell me. i did not do anything. your daughter came to me directly and asked for a hair cut’. Its always ‘your daughter’ when these kind of events happen. The nice things are always done by her daughter. My daughter does all the stuff that leaves us perplexed. So they went for a hair cut. When they came back and i opened the door to see her, I was stunned. This was by far the best hairdo that i have ever seen my daughter with. Her hair were all in shape, they were combed well (obviously blow dried) and looking spectacular.

I suddenly realised that she was now a young lady. She had suddenly gotten much older. I looked at her and told her exactly that. Jasmine looks at me with a bewildered look. It seems from the time that she got her hair cut to the time that she got home, she was messing around with her hair. It wasn't that good, the hair is looking all puffed up, this is not right, that she was going to wash it, or at the very least, she was going to wet some parts of her hair, that she was going to tie it up blah blah. She did mess around a bit. Then Jasmine and i just said - fair - do what you want to, just once before you do anything, lets take a few pics, just so that we know for ourselves what you are capable of looking like and then you can do whatever you want. We took a few pics and one with me and her, i put on FB. This one was the one that garnered the most amount of likes that i have ever seen. in the first couple of hours itself - it crossed a 100 likes. At the tim of writing  - it is stable at around 235 odd. Hah! A simple pic that has no background, no real story, just a  pic of me and my child looking like a lovely lady and there -boom - its breaks the internet as far as I am concerned. As Jasmine was telling me - its not me but Jispa getting all the likes! Yup I agree. 

Facebook is a reflection of the kind of society we live in. young single women putting up pictures of themselves tend to garner a larger share of likes from suitable males than anyone else. Similarly a 40 year old male (me) will garner the most likes when seen in the company of his child or wife - looking all family and all. As that is what is what is expected of me, looking good with family, the archetype of the  loving and caring dad who finds his soul in his family that he cares and provides for … 




Tuesday, July 23, 2013

so whats the point of a vacation, anyways?

So whats the prime focus of a vacation. Getting away from it all. Yes and no. getting away from it all is important. You cant really face the stress of everyday living on a vacation. You like to go away, forget the daily grind and enjoy life a bit. So getting away is important. But another one is trying to bond and spend time with family. That’s an important one for Jasmine and me. For us vacation is family time. Spending time with each other and spending time with Jispa. Full on family time. We like to do things together and hence we end up searching for stuff that allows everybody to be together. Of course that means that we elders can get really really bored trying to do things that the kid enjoys because you can’t really expect eth kid to understand stuff that parents enjoy. So invariably it becomes a kid centered vacation. I understand why my mom once told that she is now completely bored of seeing zoos. Everywhere we went she and daddy would just take us to the zoo. Yup.  It does get boring after a while. Where all have we visited zoos. From the more interesting ones at Singapore and Mysore to the more tiring one at Junagadh. We have been everywhere. Go to a city and check – zoo? Yup we are coming. One full hot day gone. Man it’s a good thing that Jispa is growing up. I am nearly totally done with zoos.
This time around in London as well. I was completely tired of them. I was going through the motions. Trying my best to enjoy the dam zoo, but it just wasn’t fun enough. Also the fact is that Singapore zoo is far better than the London zoo and once you have done that London doesn’t come close. It does seem to me that Singapore copied the London zoo model and taken it to another level altogether. It’s great and I was awestruck by it. So I honestly hope and pray that is my last zoo experience to come for a long time.
But the point I am trying to make is slightly different. Jasmine and I often discuss this. There are many of our friends who leave their kids and go on vacations. The kids stay with the grandparents while the couple takes off. That’s also a cool vacation but we just don’t understand it. I would want to spend every time I get off with Jispa and Jasmine together. Of course the dumb ass zoos come with the package but there are so many other benefits as well. There is so much to talk to them, listen to them, have conversations and have fun. Jispa is integral to the whole thing. I guess will grow older without the chance to do many fun young stuff that young adults can do. But it would have still been fun. I probably started working early, got married, became a father before I got the money to do what I could have done as a young adult, but hey, the joy of growing up with Jispa was unparalleled. So Jasmine and I just can’t understand the others who go out for vacations without kids. But then eacht o their own. Who am I to pass judgement.
The other thing about vacations is – luxury. Of course as income goes up the kind of money one spends also goes up. We don’t travel by second non AC sleeper trains anymore. That is too much. The loos and the crowd and the dirt are probably too much to handle. And if the trains aren’t convenient a flight booking is in order. But I think I want to draw the line as far as a complete luxury holiday is concerned. I FOR NOW… don’t want a holiday in which the family goes to a resort of sorts and stay at ease for a week, eating , drinking and relaxing. I don’t have anything against the five stars. I think they are pretty cool and nice to be pampered, but I am not too sure on the pampering thing for us. There is so much learning to be had just by staying in slightly less sterile environments. You stay close to the city, you meet and talk to more people, you take the train and public transport, you walk around… the works. That’s the fun bit. When we stayed in London we stayed at a friends place. She opened the doors of her home and heart to us. That was the only reason we could afford a London vacation for as many days. It’s impossible otherwise. But in hindsight, that was the smartest move we made. I think vacations are as much about learning as much about relaxing. You go around, you meet, you see, you explore and you learn. You learn about people, cultures, nature, and life. Everything about things you weren’t exposed to. In London, staying at a friend’s place gave us a sneak peek into the life of an everyday Londoner. What’s the commute what’s the life and what normal people do. Taking the train and the bus to reach home gave Jispa a real feel of London and its people. That is important. She all sorts of people in the tube, she saw all the different types of stations, she changed trains and understood how efficient and organized it is. That’s the learning bit and who said learning can’t be fun. Staying with our friend in the end is what made the trip extra memorable and FUN.

I admit I was being a  bit judgmental or a bit of an ass when a friend was asking me about my vacation and I replies “well, we have a choice either to go on a one week luxury vacation and come back dumber or go on a different vacation and come back smarter”. I am not saying that every vacation has to be a boot camp but hell, going out and feeling the city is a great thing to do. Leaning may be as important as anything else in a vacation. It doesn’t cost too much to open your eyes. In fact in hindsight I’d say it’s far better a call then a five star. Money can make people do many things. Losing touch with reality is probably one of them. But hell, when you are rich – do you really care about reality? You can afford not :)