Religion divides more than it unites. It gives a sense of identity
but at the same time it also uses the identity to group and pit one against the
other. I am sick and tired of religion and culture being used as benchmarks for
anything. I have learnt to abhor religion but funnily not yet abhor God. Also my
belief has been to look inward and seek strength than to ask God for help. Hoping
that God will somehow materialize and work his mircales is something I have
learnt not to trust. Put faith in your hands and your thoughts and your deeds.
Oops – what with the sudden burst of philosophy. Well nothing
really. Today I heard a podcast that spoke about the pope and how he was not
too happy with this unchecked market economy of sorts.
When I was growing up I was a curious mix of a religious guy
and a leftist. Poverty and hunger were essentially state subjects and could be
solved by taking the money from the rich and redistributing it to the poor. Why
should there be poverty. Can the state just simply redistribute it? Over the
years I moved from left to a free market believer. And at the same time I moved
from being a religious person to an agnostic. The transformation was complete.
But at heart I remained a person still moved by problems of the world. I refused
to accept the simple notion that people are poor because they have taken those
choices in life. I would agree that in Mumbai city no one can really be poor
and a complete destitute. They is no
reason to beg on the road. There is enough work in Mumbai for people who are
ready to work hard. But that is a simplistic view. While they may be marginalized,
there is no reason for letting them come out. The idea – in words of Jeffery
Sachs is to give them a ladder. Then it is up to to them to climb out of it. I don’t
believe in dole but I do believe in an infrastructure whether it is social or
economic or even physical (roads rail etc). and these cannot be dictated by
free market but by the power of common good.
I keep thinking. I don’t give money away to charity. I don’t
trust any of these characters. I don’t believe in them. So what do I do. I know
that I want to give my time and attention at the end ot something meaningful
but I guess my form of charity is simply teaching those around me. Guiding them,
talking to them and trying to build a happier planet – one person, one
interaction at a time.
So, I believe in what I think the point the Pope is trying to
tell. Free markets with no moral compass is a dangerous thing. where Only the
fittest survive, we don’t give a chance or care a dam about the others. In the
long run – it will create an oligopoly and the concentration of the haves will
lord over the have nots in an unfettered sort of way.
Bah! But why is all this so important? Why am I thinking about
it. I have always wondered where my moral compass has come from? I believe that
a lot of it may have come from religion driven ethics and morals. I don’t think
would have been a vegetarian if not for the fact that I was born in a Jain household.
That’s the simplest example. So while I can have a source of morality (whatever
form or manner), I wonder what happens to Jispa when she grows up. Even the
Buddhists sects realized that a simple idea of Buddha understood as a thought
and not a figure was tough and then migrated to an image of Him and in many
ways worshipped him. Same so with Jainism. The god Mahavir verus The God
Mahavir has been an undercurrent theme that I see in those around me. We deify
a saint more than take home his principals. But then would I have been able to
understand those teachings without the accompanying rituals. It’s a question I may
never be able to answer.
But with Jispa we will know when she grows up. She knows no
prayer and she knows almost no God. We have no image of him at home and we don’t
pray not believe in rituals. We silently stay out of rituals that we are called
for. So when she grows up she will have to have a moral compass that is her
own. That is possibly from her parents and surroundings – school, peers etc. it
will not be out of fear of God or for greater good in the next life. She will
be what she is because she will choose it for herself.
Well it does sound good when I write it down like this. but
the risk of not having a moral compass just because your parents were too anal
about religion is a bit of a bummer. But yes. Jasmine and I still have faith in
this approach. Be yourself. Be what you want to be not because of dogmas but because
of your choices and your decisions. Let the wisdom passé don from centuries
only be your reference for learning and listening. But do your own bit. And
least of all – religion is meant to liberate not restrict. Liberate? – once it
gives you a moral compass – you then free to do what you wish. Like I once
blogged in the past. When you restrict a certain opportunity to yourself you
are in effect giving yourself the freedom to do what you want to. The only
question is where is that moral compass coming from and how seriously are you
taking it. It is only a liberator not a restrictor. If it restricting – then throw
it.
Just for the record – the Freaknomics podcast - though I never figured that I may agree with the Pope (or least see his point of view - in some angular sort of way. though this Pope Francis seems to be an interesting character.
you can get his EVANGELII GAUDIUM here: though to make sense of it you may want to read some other sources. http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/apost_exhortations/documents/papa-francesco_esortazione-ap_20131124_evangelii-gaudium_en.html
you can get his EVANGELII GAUDIUM here: though to make sense of it you may want to read some other sources. http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/apost_exhortations/documents/papa-francesco_esortazione-ap_20131124_evangelii-gaudium_en.html